<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Write Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hankcampbell.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hankcampbell.com</link>
	<description>From The Creator Of Science 2.0 ®</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Elements Make Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/elements_make_headlines-112421</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/elements_make_headlines-112421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logicman</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=7a716a38ee565453a058c8bc247719a0</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elements Make HeadlinesIf you ever enjoyed Tom Lehrer's take on the elements, or even if not, check out this way of using the names of the elements in a novel way:http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Elements Make Headlines</strong><br /><br />If you ever enjoyed <a href="http://youtu.be/SmwlzwGMMwc">Tom Lehrer's take on the elements</a>, or even if not, check out this way of using the names of the elements in a novel way:<br /><br /><a href="http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html">http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/elements-make-headlines-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elements Make Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/elements_make_headlines-112421</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/elements_make_headlines-112421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logicman</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=7a716a38ee565453a058c8bc247719a0</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elements Make HeadlinesIf you ever enjoyed Tom Lehrer's take on the elements, or even if not, check out this way of using the names of the elements in a novel way:http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Elements Make Headlines</strong><br /><br />If you ever enjoyed <a href="http://youtu.be/SmwlzwGMMwc">Tom Lehrer's take on the elements</a>, or even if not, check out this way of using the names of the elements in a novel way:<br /><br /><a href="http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html">http://news.knowledgedoor.s3.amazonaws.com/home_headlines.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/elements-make-headlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Defense of DSM-5 Making Tantrums A Mental Disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/defense_dsm5_making_tantrums_mental_disorder-112419</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/defense_dsm5_making_tantrums_mental_disorder-112419#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=27528c8b469d0e43e545e45923310b96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the new DSM-5 has attracted plenty of criticism - and the National Institute of Mental Health has given up on it, saying "patients with mental disorders deserve better" - not everyone is critical.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[While the new DSM-5 has attracted plenty of criticism - <a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/nimh_delivers_kill_shot_dsm5-111138" >and the National Institute of Mental Health has given up on it</a>, saying "patients with mental disorders deserve better" - not everyone is critical.<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/in-defense-of-dsm-5-making-tantrums-a-mental-disorder-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Defense of DSM-5 Making Tantrums A Mental Disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/defense_dsm5_making_tantrums_mental_disorder-112419</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/defense_dsm5_making_tantrums_mental_disorder-112419#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=27528c8b469d0e43e545e45923310b96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the new DSM-5 has attracted plenty of criticism - and the National Institute of Mental Health has given up on it, saying "patients with mental disorders deserve better" - not everyone is critical.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[While the new DSM-5 has attracted plenty of criticism - <a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/nimh_delivers_kill_shot_dsm5-111138" >and the National Institute of Mental Health has given up on it</a>, saying "patients with mental disorders deserve better" - not everyone is critical.<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/in-defense-of-dsm-5-making-tantrums-a-mental-disorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Denies Claim That GM Alfalfa Is A &#8216;Plant Pest&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/9th_circuit_court_appeals_denies_claim_gm_alfalfa_plant_pest-112406</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/9th_circuit_court_appeals_denies_claim_gm_alfalfa_plant_pest-112406#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Education and Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=fe5f6fa8c37e54754d16acc20a735fda</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in California, you can never get too amazed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. If there is a progressive position that an activist court can take, they usually take it.If you can't go to a national chain store and get your eyes checked an...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you live in California, you can never get too amazed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. If there is a progressive position that an activist court can take, they usually take it.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.hankcampbell.com/2012/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-declares-one-stop-eyewear-too-convenient/" >If you can't go to a national chain store and get your eyes checked and buy glasses</a>, the 9th is why - they ruled that is medical care and health care is not interstate in America. Sure, we can mandate health care and force people to pay for it under the Commerce clause, but for some reason we can't let people buy prescription glasses from an out-of-state company.<br />
<!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/9th_circuit_court_appeals_denies_claim_gm_alfalfa_plant_pest-112406" dc:identifier="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/9th_circuit_court_appeals_denies_claim_gm_alfalfa_plant_pest-112406" dc:title="9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Denies Claim That GM Alfalfa Is A &#039;Plant Pest&#039;" trackback:ping="http://www.science20.com/trackback/112406" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->
<p><a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/9th_circuit_court_appeals_denies_claim_gm_alfalfa_plant_pest-112406" >read more</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-denies-claim-that-gm-alfalfa-is-a-plant-pest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How The NBA&#8217;s Maloofs Are Like World War II&#8217;s Claude Auchinleck</title>
		<link>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/how-the-nbas-maloofs-are-like-world-war-iis-claude-auchinleck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/how-the-nbas-maloofs-are-like-world-war-iis-claude-auchinleck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?p=3178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics leads to sometimes dizzying decisions, on battlefields and in boardrooms. The Maloof family, majority owners of the NBA Sacramento Kings, are in final negotiations to sell the team to California investors after being denied permission to sell the team to Seattle investors, who would move it.  The same Seattle that lost its team the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics leads to sometimes dizzying decisions, on battlefields and in boardrooms.</p>
<p>The Maloof family, majority owners of the NBA Sacramento Kings, are in final negotiations to sell the team to California investors after being denied permission to sell the team to Seattle investors, who would move it.  The same Seattle that lost its team the exact same way.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, plans for a publicly-financed new arena are moving along full-steam. The same arena the public denied the Maloofs.</p>
<p>If the Maloofs know their military history, they see a parable. They are the Claude Auchinleck of the NBA and they just got replaced by Bernard Montgomery.  You may not know any military history but Auchinleck was a well-liked British General, who fought in North Africa.  He had reasonable success but was stymied by one of the greatest generals on any side in the war: Erwin Rommel (Guderian would be in the running also).  Auchinleck reported to Churchill that they needed more time and more men to drive Rommel out of El Alamein. The allies had already beaten Rommel there once but Churchill had a vote of no-confidence looming, he didn&#8217;t need someone to tell him it would take two more months.  So he replaced Auchinleck, who believed attrition would solve the Rommel problem (German supply lines were greatly hindered), with Montgomery, who said all the right things and then asked for more time and equipment. The same thing Auchinleck just asked for.</p>
<p>But you can&#8217;t be a politician and fire another General, that looks like government incompetence. And Montgomery had those smart people at Bletchley Park, who provided Rommel&#8217;s battle plan. The stage was set and Montgomery knew he did not need to attack &#8211; the thing Churchill wanted and replaced his predecessor over not doing &#8211; he just waited to be attacked, which had to happen before Rommel ran out of supplies.  The thing that started the fight at Gettysburg in the American Civil War was that the south had no shoes and set out to get some. They were desperate. And Montgomery knew Rommel was desperate also.</p>
<p>Montgomery was so confident, due to knowing the battle plan and that the supply situation was desperate, <a href="http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/battle_of_el_alamein.htm" target="_blank">he supposedly went back to sleep after an aide told him of the attack</a>. Even after Rommel failed, Montgomery did not counter-attack. He was waiting on the &#8216;more men and equipment&#8217; Churchill fired Auchinleck over &#8211; in this case 300 Sherman tanks from the USA. When Montgomery did attack, it failed and <em>he</em> blamed his chief of tanks.  But a few months later Rommel was broken in North Africa and after the war the Brits got a new Viscount Montgomery of Alamein and gave him a seat in the House of Lords.</p>
<p>Montgomery&#8217;s military career after the war was a disaster, they kept shuttling him from honorary post to honorary post to keep him away from the actual military. Meanwhile, Auchinleck was promoted to commander-in-chief of forces in India and got promoted to field marshall, the highest rank in the British Army. After the war, he was supreme commander in India and Pakistan as they prepared for independence.  Yet amateur historians of World War II only recall that Churchill replaced him with Montgomery.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://www.hankcampbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Maloofs-as-Claude-Auchinleck.jpg" width="500" /><br />
<em>In this political climate, even Montgomery could have won against the Maloofs.</em></p>
<p>So history is not going to remember that the Maloofs built a successful franchise from one that was terrible when they acquired it &#8211; the sale price is the highest in NBA history and they paid $156 million in 1998. <a href="http://www.nba.com/2013/news/05/17/david-aldridge-on-kings-sell/index.html" target="_blank">$347.75 million in their pockets after 15 years is not too shabby</a>.  History won&#8217;t remember that the same arena project the local government jammed through to keep the team in 2013 was put up for a public vote when the Maloofs tried.  A vote everyone knew would fail. But the new Generals in the NBA war have gotten $258 million in public funds somehow.</p>
<p>History is going to remember that it was a game of defense and attrition was going to be key; one last, desperate effort would make or break things. Like Rommel, the Maloofs lost but that doesn&#8217;t mean they didn&#8217;t know what they were doing. It just means politically desperate leaders sometimes go for different over better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/how-the-nbas-maloofs-are-like-world-war-iis-claude-auchinleck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University of Maryland Students Connect4Climate</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/university_maryland_students_connect4climate-112338</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/cool-links/university_maryland_students_connect4climate-112338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=226f2a0428ab92bb2f5ee8b726bc9856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Students of&#160;sociology professor Dr. Leszek Sibilski at University of Maryland made a video asking for action on climate change. &#160;They regard climate change as a social problem - most in science would regard it as a physics one but certainly t...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Students of&nbsp;sociology professor Dr. <span>Leszek Sibilski</span> at University of Maryland made a video asking for action on climate change. &nbsp;They regard climate change as a social problem - most in science would regard it as a physics one but certainly taking action is a political, and therefore social, issue.<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/university-of-maryland-students-connect4climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment Banking On Wall Street Is Less Competitive Than The LHC</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=c794d6fcc35095154331e838b1e7ec05</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a particle physicist, and not French, your career at Conseil Europ&#233;en pour la Recherche Nucl&#233;aire &#160;- <a href="http://conseil%20europ%C3%A9en%20pour%20la%20recherche%20nucl%C3%A9aire/" target="_blank">CERN</a>, The European Organization for Nuclear Research and the world's largest physics laboratory - may be rather limited, it seems.<br />&#60;!--



--&#62;<p><a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you are a particle physicist, and not French, your career at Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire &nbsp;- <a href="http://conseil%20europ%C3%A9en%20pour%20la%20recherche%20nucl%C3%A9aire/" >CERN</a>, The European Organization for Nuclear Research and the world's largest physics laboratory - may be rather limited, it seems.<br />
<!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294" dc:identifier="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294" dc:title="Investment Banking On Wall Street Is Less Competitive Than The LHC" trackback:ping="http://www.science20.com/trackback/112294" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->
<p><a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/investment_banking_wall_street_less_competitive_lhc-112294" >read more</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/investment-banking-on-wall-street-is-less-competitive-than-the-lhc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Sea Level Rise, The IPCC Is Right &#8211; And That&#8217;s Good For Us</title>
		<link>http://www.science20.com/science_20/sea_level_rise_ipcc_right_and_thats_good_us-112099</link>
		<comments>http://www.science20.com/science_20/sea_level_rise_ipcc_right_and_thats_good_us-112099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oceanography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?guid=9db4a5f7940abb4b875379c2c2209ea5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people believe the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is a small, unified body composed of the best scientists who make proclamations on lots of things.That isn't really true. The actual IPCC is a tiny UN group, around a dozen people...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some people believe the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is a small, unified body composed of the best scientists who make proclamations on lots of things.<br /><br />That isn't really true. The actual IPCC <em>is</em> a tiny UN group, around a dozen people, but the bulk of the data is compiled by unpaid (well, unpaid by the UN) scientists who participate in working groups that argue over the science - it is not without some flaws. They use geographical and gender parameters for participation so a working group may not have the best scientists in the world, some will have been chosen because they needed to meet a cultural quota - and they still get to be heard.&nbsp;<br />
<!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.science20.com/science_20/sea_level_rise_ipcc_right_and_thats_good_us-112099" dc:identifier="http://www.science20.com/science_20/sea_level_rise_ipcc_right_and_thats_good_us-112099" dc:title="On Sea Level Rise, The IPCC Is Right - And That&#039;s Good For Us" trackback:ping="http://www.science20.com/trackback/112099" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->
<p><a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/sea_level_rise_ipcc_right_and_thats_good_us-112099" >read more</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/on-sea-level-rise-the-ipcc-is-right-and-thats-good-for-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama Favors Wind Over Oil &#8211; And Is Breaking Federal Law</title>
		<link>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/president-obama-favors-wind-over-oil-and-is-breaking-federal-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/president-obama-favors-wind-over-oil-and-is-breaking-federal-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hankcampbell.com/?p=3161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration is currently embroiled in three big scandals that have nothing to do with science &#8211; the vast, right wing conspiracy that said they edited out references to terrorism in the Benghazi murders by Muslim extremists turned out to be true, they had the IRS targeting conservative groups for special attention and they [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration is currently embroiled in three big scandals that have nothing to do with science &#8211; the vast, right wing conspiracy that said they edited out references to terrorism in the Benghazi murders by Muslim extremists turned out to be true, they had the IRS targeting conservative groups for special attention and they have been tapping the phones of Associated Press reporters and editors.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all very Watergate-y but unfortunately President Obama has been more like Nixon than Lyndon Johnson in his incompetence at it.  Nixon tried to use Johnson&#8217;s tactics but he got caught where Johnson did not, which makes him and Obama also-rans to the true master, the guy who got so many dead people to vote in Texas (a tactic duplicated in Daley&#8217;s Chicago of the day, so President Obama learned that history as well) he stole the election from Nixon in 1960.</p>
<p>The administration has broken all kinds of laws &#8211; even Tom Brokaw and Maureen Dowd have turned on him, and rightly so. There is optimism about his politics because it matches their own and then there is enabling corruption and they are not going to enable corruption.</p>
<p>One law he breaks that gets no attention at all regards Eagles, which are a vulnerable species and therefore killing them, even by accident, is a federal crime.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that the administration doesn&#8217;t care. They have been really good about prosecuting oil companies if a bird falls in a waste pit, or energy companies when they hit a power line.  They just don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s one of his pet causes, like the wind energy sector that gets all that government money.  Not only has a wind company never been prosecuted, unlike successful energy sources, they don&#8217;t even bother to report the deaths.</p>
<p>When companies do voluntarily report deaths, <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_WIND_ENERGY_EAGLE_DEATHS?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2013-05-14-07-57-59" target="_blank">Dina Cappiello at Associated Press writes</a>, &#8220;the Obama administration in many cases refuses to make the information public, saying it belongs to the energy companies or that revealing it would expose trade secrets or implicate ongoing enforcement investigations.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if you also want to break the law &#8211; join a green energy company and get the White House to say any federal laws you break are private information the public has no need to know about.</p>
<p>Look for Dina to have her phone tapped as well. The administration doesn&#8217;t seem to like reporters at AP who do actual journalism.</p>
<p>Read another take, this one berating environmental groups for being bought off so easily, in<a href="http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/wind_farm1_eagle0-107585" target="_blank"> Wind Power:1 &#8211; Eagles: 0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hankcampbell.com/2013/president-obama-favors-wind-over-oil-and-is-breaking-federal-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.268 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-19 13:13:34 -->
